J.K. was a co-founder who was ousted along with three

[rifattryo.ut11]

We see where the science is going, so it's understandable that people are worried about the future. Specifically, the work we've done at and the way we've deployed these models, I think we have an excellent team, and we've deployed these models very safely, and I'm very proud of that. Given the speed of technological progress and our own progress, it's very important to focus on safety, protection frameworks, and we need to think about how we think about the risks of training and deploying cutting-edge models. Moderator: You mentioned these issues. I wonder why the need for NDAs and stricter rules than other companies? The open letter comes after a series of high-profile departures including J.



K. and K. They led the alignment team israel phone numbers responsible for security. this message on : "In the past year the security culture and processes have been replaced by shiny new products." This is one of the most persistent criticisms of . Do you think this is fair? Why or why not? If you say you take security very seriously and they say you don't, how do you respond to this criticism? : First of all, the alignment team is not the only team responsible for security.



There are many security teams. The alignment team is a very important security team, but it is only one of them. We have a lot of people working on safety and I can explain more about that in a minute. And he's an amazing researcher and colleague who I worked with for three years and I have great respect for. He left to join a competitor. I think we do need to be more focused on safety, protection and regulatory engagement given the progress we expect in the field. But I disagree with the view that we might put product before safety.