Researchers' Complaint
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2025 10:09 am
In this sense, it could be understood that the four buttons studied in the research are not the only factors taken into account for recommendations.
Finally, YouTube claims that viewers have shandong mobile number database control over their recommendations, as they have the ability to block a video or channel so that it is not recommended to them in the future.
Researchers' Complaint
Mozilla is calling on YouTube to give users more options to have greater influence on the content offered to them. They also believe the company should be more transparent and better explain how recommendations work.
“The way YouTube and a lot of platforms operate is that they rely on a lot of passive data collection to infer what your preferences are,” says Becca Ricks, co-author of the report. “But it’s a slightly paternalistic way of operating where you’re making decisions on behalf of people. You could ask people what they want to do on the platform instead of just looking at what they’re doing,” adds the Mozilla researcher.
Conclusion
As expected, Mozilla and YouTube differ in their interpretations of how recommendation controls work. However, the difference between the two companies' claims is something that should not concern us.
Ultimately, regardless of who is right, it is always good to remind large companies of the responsibility they have, since corporate transparency and the freedom to choose what we like should be transversal to all digital platforms.
Finally, YouTube claims that viewers have shandong mobile number database control over their recommendations, as they have the ability to block a video or channel so that it is not recommended to them in the future.
Researchers' Complaint
Mozilla is calling on YouTube to give users more options to have greater influence on the content offered to them. They also believe the company should be more transparent and better explain how recommendations work.
“The way YouTube and a lot of platforms operate is that they rely on a lot of passive data collection to infer what your preferences are,” says Becca Ricks, co-author of the report. “But it’s a slightly paternalistic way of operating where you’re making decisions on behalf of people. You could ask people what they want to do on the platform instead of just looking at what they’re doing,” adds the Mozilla researcher.
Conclusion
As expected, Mozilla and YouTube differ in their interpretations of how recommendation controls work. However, the difference between the two companies' claims is something that should not concern us.
Ultimately, regardless of who is right, it is always good to remind large companies of the responsibility they have, since corporate transparency and the freedom to choose what we like should be transversal to all digital platforms.