Let's now concentrate on the relationships between a semantic core document and othe

[Shishirgano9]

Relationships include links, co-occurrences, co-citations, unlinked mentions of the domain or URL . In other words, all elements that can establish a connection to the semantic core document.

The assumption is: the better a core document or even an entire domain is in a semantic relationship to other semantically related documents, the more relevant the document itself is. This includes not only incoming links, but also outgoing ones.

Semantic Relationship Structure of Core Documents

References from the core document to other semantically gambling data romania relateddocuments within the domain can also strengthen the authority of the entire domain in the respective ontology/topic area. So the more I write about a topic area and the more holistically you describe or look at topics within your own website, the better. I don't think it's that important whether you do this on a single, detailed document or on different URLs within the domain. In my opinion, it's just a question of user-friendliness or personal taste.

The consequence of this would be that only the semantic relationship pattern counts and values ​​such as link popularity , domain popularity , page rank etc. are unimportant, which is also discussed here and there . I also no longer think it is important whether links point directly to the core document, as long as the semantic core document is so clearly recognizable to Google in terms of search intent, content and internal linking as the thematic core document among all the content of the domain.