In short, a parody is a satirical adaptation of existing works that, by exaggerating certain characteristic features, creates a caricature of a person, thing or event. For example, when a politician's election poster or the cover of a magazine with their image is modified in a humorous way to criticize their agenda.
The term pastiche is new, at least in German law, and is likely to cause the most headaches. In everyday language, it is the recognizable imitation of an artist, which can range from imitation of the style to its tracing, be it an homage or a parody.
Furthermore, unlike a quotation, the source of the chinese america data content that served as a template does not have to be stated.
Putting these exceptions together, it sounds like all content can be copied as long as you edit it a little, right?
The lack of a legal definition could actually lead one to believe that any copy of someone else's content is now permitted. However, this is not the case.
For example, a one-to-one copy will not be allowed; there must be an intellectual or cultural added value and a "fair balance" must be maintained between the rights of the authors and the users.
This means that European law has come very close to the "fair use" of the American legal system. The advantage of this is flexibility, and the disadvantage is the frequent lack of predictability of legal cases.
In any case, the legislator has cited remix, meme, GIF, mashup, fan art, fan fiction, cover or sampling as positive examples of pastiche, which at least suggests a generous copyright interpretation of the term.
Furthermore, no claim is made as to the quality of the cultural added value or even the copyright-based level of creativity of a parody, caricature or pastiche. Unlike with a quotation, its use does not have to be necessary as evidence for one's own statements or thoughts. This means that mere distortion for entertainment purposes is sufficient for a permissible parody.